Igma 50mm F14 Art Dg Hsm Lens for Canon
Domicile Donate NewSearch Gallery Reviews How-To Books Links Workshops About Contact
Sigma 50mm f/i.four
Globe'due south Sharpest 50mm AF lens
DG HSM Fine art (2014-)
Intro Specifications Operation Compared Recommendations
Sigma 50mm f/i.iv DG, Nikon version (covers all full-frame and APS-C formats, 77mm filters, 28.5 oz./809g, 1.3'/0.4m shut focus, almost $950. Also comes in Canon EOS, Sony Blastoff (Minolta MAXXUM) and Sigma mounts.) The biggest source of support for this free website is when y'all apply these links, especially this link direct to this lens at Adorama and this link to information engineering science at Amazon, when yous get annihilation, regardless of the state in which you live. It helps me proceed adding to this free website when y'all become yours through these links — but I receive zippo for my efforts if y'all buy elsewhere. Thanks for your back up! Ken.
September 2015 Sigma reviews Nikon Canon LEICA Pentax Sony
NEW: Premium 50mm Lenses Compared 04 September 2014
Sample Epitome Files (more than are in the review)
Hoehn, 29 August 2014. (Nikon D810, Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART, f/8 at 1/250 at Auto ISO 100, Perfectly Clear.) bigger or Full-resolution © file.
Rat Palm, 02 September 2014. 36 MP FX Nikon D810, Sigma 50mm f/1.iv DG HSM ART, f/5.6 at one/125 at ISO 100. Camera-original Big Basic JPG (v MB; the palm isn't flat so much isn't in focus).
Rat Palm bark, 02 September 2014. 36 MP FX Nikon D810, Sigma 50mm f/one.four DG HSM ART, f/four at 1/60 at ISO 100 at close focus. Camera-original Large BASIC JPG (5 MB; the palm isn't flat and then much isn't in focus).
Introduction top
Intro Specifications Performance Compared Recommendations
This Sigma 50mm f/i.iv is an optically superb lens. Optically information technology is the best 50mm, 55mm or 58mm SLR lens I've ever tested.
Under exacting examination conditions, this Sigma lens is sharper than Nikon's and Canon's best, and sharper than LEICA'southward 50mm f/1.4 ASPH. This Sigma lens as well has no baloney, unlike whatever f/i.4 or f/1.2 lens from LEICA, Catechism or Nikon.
Optically this lens is boggling — only then are the Nikon 50mm f/i.4 M, Nikon 58mm f/one.4 One thousand and Canon 50mm f/1.2 L. This Sigma lens is a piffling sharper on the test range, and has less baloney than whatever other f/one.4 or f/1.ii lens — but I'd never see any departure in real-world shooting.
There are no visible sharpness differences between this Sigma and other 50mm lenses at normal shooting apertures. At f/four and smaller, all these 50mm lenses are the same, and fifty-fifty the f/1.eight lenses are indistinguishable from ane another.
The sharpness differences announced at the largest apertures similar f/one.4, and appear in the far corners. This is where this Sigma lens shines, and the others are almost every bit good. If I rig upward a examination with all other variables removed I tin demonstrate the college corner sharpness of the Sigma lens at f/one.iv, but few people accept any demand or interest in sharpness at f/1.4 in the far corners, since they are usually supposed to be out of focus. If you're an f/1.iv exam-chart and brick-wall shooter y'all'll love this lens to decease, merely if you stop downwards, they're duplicate from one some other.
This Sigma lens is much bigger, heavier and more expensive than similar photographic camera-brand lenses similar the superb Nikon 50mm f/one.iv Grand.
Focus is silent, and you lot lot may take hold of the ring at any time for instant transmission focus override. At to the everyman degree on the Nikon version I bought, Sigma finally has this figured out.
Compatibility
It comes in mounts for Nikon, Catechism EOS, Sony Blastoff (Minolta MAXXUM) and Sigma.
It covers all size sensors.
Nikon
I tried it on my Nikon D810 (2014), Nikon D2HS (2005), Nikon D100 (2002), Nikon D1 (1999) and Nikon F4 from 1988 and everything worked fine. That's piece of cake, since Sigma knows most these cameras. Our business organisation is will it piece of work with cameras we purchase in x years most which Sigma knows goose egg today? Just the years will tell.
The Nikon version should work perfectly on every digital Nikon always made, both FX and DX, from the best Df, D4s, D810 and D610 to Nikon'southward cheapest digitals like the D40, D40x, D60, D3000, D3100, D3200, D3300, D5000, D5100, D5200 and D5300.
It also should be perfect on decent or recent AF motion picture cameras like the F6, F100, F5, N80 and N75.
The incompatibilities for older or cheaper 35mm cameras are that:
1.) Information technology won't autofocus with the cheapest new AF 35mm cameras like the N55, simply if you focus manually, everything else works cracking. Fifty-fifty if yous lose autofocus, these cameras take in-finder focus confirmation dots to assist you.
2.) Late 1980s ~ early 1990s AF cameras like the N90s, N70 and F4 volition focus just fine, just you'll lose VR. You lot'll have Program and Shutter-priority modes, just lose Transmission and Aperture-priority since you take no way to set the aperture on the camera or on the lens.
3.) You're actually pushing information technology with the oldest AF cameras like the N2020, N6006 and N8008. You'll have no AF, confused exposure modes, and no VR. Manual focus is fine, along with electronic focus indications.
iv.) Since it has no aperture ring, it'due south but about useless with transmission focus film cameras. It volition shoot every shot at its minimum aperture.
Run across Nikon Lens Compatibility for details with your photographic photographic camera. Read downwards the "AF-Southward, AF-I" and "M" columns for this lens. You'll go the least of all the features displayed in all columns, since "K" (gelding) is a deliberate handicap which removes features and compatibility.
Canon
It is supposed to work on all EOS cameras, which means everything from 1987's EOS 650 to everything in 2014.
Specifications tiptop
Intro Specifications Performance Compared Recommendations
Proper name elevation
Sigma calls this the Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM ART.
DG: "Digital," merely marketing fluff. Works fine on autofocus 35mm SLRs, besides.
HSM: Ultrasonic autofocus motor.
ART: "Art" serial, which is more than marketing distortion. I create Fine Art, non simply "fine art" (I don't show my work in java shops), and would prefer a FART lens optimized for that.
Optics pinnacle
13 elements in 8 groups.
3 elements of SLD drinking glass, which Nikon calls ED and Canon calls UD.
Aspherical rear chemical element.
Multicoated by and large in blueish-greenish.
Internal (rear) focusing. Nothing moves externally equally focused.
Diaphragm top
Sigma 50mm f/i.4.
9 rounded blades.
Stops down to f/16.
Very round at large apertures, while even so giving reasonable sunstars stopped downward.
Coverage top
35mm flick, Full-Frame, FX, DX and APS-C.
Focal Length top
50mm.
When used on a DX or APS-C photographic camera, it sees an bending of view similar to what an 80mm lens sees when used on an FX or 35mm camera.
Bending of View peak
46.8° diagonally on full-frame.
Close Focus top
i.3 anxiety (0.iv meters) from the image plane, specified.
i.25 anxiety (0.39 meters), measured.
Maximum Reproduction Ratio acme
i:5.half dozen (0.18x).
Hard Infinity Focus Terminate? acme
No.
You lot take to allow the AF system focus at infinity.
Focus Scale summit
Yes, simply compressed and pretty much illegible.
Depth-of-Field Calibration top
None, unless yous lot consider ticks for only f/16 as a calibration. I don't.
Infra-Red Focus Index acme
None.
Aperture Ring pinnacle
None.
Filter Thread top
77 mm, plastic.
Does not move.
Size superlative
Sigma specifies iii.4" (85.4 mm) diameter by three.ix" (99.9 mm) extension from flange.
Weight summit
28.545 oz. (809.3g), bodily measured.
Sigma specifies 28.seven oz. (815 g).
Hood elevation
LH-780-06 Hood on Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG.
Plastic LH-830-02 bayonet hood, included.
Case meridian
Instance, Sigma 50mm f/i.4 DG.
Dainty padded nylon instance included.
Included peak
Lens, caps and hood.
Case.
Paperwork.
Made in elevation
Lens made in Japan.
Warranty acme
one yr.
Sigma The states of america's website implies iii years extended warranty for the USA, for a total of iv years.
Packaging top
White paper-thin box.
Box, Sigma 50mm f/1.iv DG.
In this box sits the instance with the lens and hood inside. The case is the padding - at that place is no cream.
Appear pinnacle
Apr 2014.
Available Since top
August 2014.
Price, Us top
August-September 2014: $950.
Sigma 50mm f/one.4 DG. enlarge.
Operation peak
Intro Specifications Functioning Compared Recommendations
Overall Autofocus Bokeh Color Blackout
Distortion Ergonomics Falloff Filters
Focus Breathing Ghosts Hood Lateral Colour Fringes
Macro Mechanics Sharpness Sunstars
Overall operation summit
The Sigma 50mm f/1.four DG has fantastic eyes — merely its mechanics and potential for hereafter photographic camera incompatibility are why you pay less for Sigma than for a professional person Nikon or Catechism lens.
The but style to see whatever optical divergence between these is if yous're shooting test charts at f/1.iv and looking in the far corners. If non, Nikon and Catechism's least expensive 50mm f/1.viii lenses offer images just as sharp, and also without any distortion in the example of the Nikon 50/i.eight AF-D.
Autofocus performance pinnacle
Overall
AF works corking on my Nikon D810 and every other Nikon on which I tried it, fifty-fifty my Nikon F4 from 1988.
It's fast and quiet.
AF Speed
Autofocus is very fast.
AF Accuracy
On my Nikon D810, AF was dead-on for every frame, specially shot at f/1.four where this is critical.
Transmission Focus
Transmission focus is corking, but accept hold of the band at whatsoever time for instant manual focus override.
The manual focus band is geared for full general news and activeness shooting.
Information engineering'southward non as precise (irksome) equally you might similar if you lot're using Alive View on a tripod.
Transmission Focus Override
Manual focus override works peachy, at to the lowest degree on the Nikon version I tried.
Bokeh operation superlative
Bokeh, the grapheme of out of focus backgrounds, not simply how far out of focus they are, is off-white to skillful at f/1.four.
Backgrounds become soft and rarely distract, simply they aren't always completely soft.
Color Rendition operation tiptop
The color rendition seems the same as my Nikkor AF lenses.
Blackout performance top
Blackout (saggital coma flare) ofttimes causes weird smeared blobs to appear effectually vivid points of lite in the corners of fast or broad lenses at large apertures. In lenses that take it, blackout goes away as stopped downwardly.
I run into very picayune blackout with this aspherical lens, and what footling in that location is goes away every bit stopped down.
Baloney operation acme
Museum Courtyard, San Francisco, 02 September 2014. 36 MP FX Nikon D810, Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art, f/eight at 1/250 at ISO 100. bigger or Camera-original LARGE Bones JPG (v MB).
The Sigma 50mm f/i.four DG has no visible baloney, which is much better than any f/i.4 or f/ane.2 lens I've always tested.
This is more of import than sharpness. This Sigma isn't that much sharper than other lenses, only information technology does have much less baloney than whatever f/1.4 or f/1.2 lens ever from Canon or Nikon or LEICA. Bravo!
This is proficient considering no Nikon or Canon camera volition be able to correct this automatically considering in that location is no in-camera profile available.
This Sigma has no measurable baloney at distances of i meter or more. Data applied science has slight butt distortion at its closest focus altitude.
The distortion at the closest altitude isn't visible and can exist corrected easily past plugging these figures into Photoshop's lens baloney filter for more than critical utilise. These aren't facts or specifications, they are the results of my enquiry that requires hours of photography and calculations on the resulting information.
© 2014 KenRockwell.com. All rights reserved.
Ergonomics (handling and ease-of-utilize) performance top
Sigma 50mm f/one.4 DG.
Ergonomics are obvious: grab and get.
This lens is a pain compared to Nikon or Catechism's f/one.iv or f/ane.two lenses; this Sigma is too darn big and heavy to really want to deport it around all 24-hr interval.
Its edges are relatively difficult, dissimilar Nikon and Canon'south lenses whose edges are softer.
The ribbed rubber rings grip very well, but take precipitous ridges and are much less comfortable than the pro lenses.
The footage calibration is illegible; it's tiny and dark greyness. In my studio shot in a higher place it'due south well-lit and bigger than life, merely in reality you'll rarely be able to read information technology — and if you can, good luck remembering which is meters and which is feet.
Falloff (darkened corners) operation top
I run into nearly no falloff at f/ane.iv, and none at other apertures, all on full-frame.
This is superb operation, and important considering there are no lens profiles to bail you lot lot out on Nikon and Canon.
I've greatly exaggerated what little at that place is past shooting a gray field and presented the images confronting some other gray field:
Sigma l/1.iv Fine art falloff on FX and 35mm at infinity, no correction.
© 2014 KenRockwell.com. All rights reserved.
Filters, utilise with performance top
There is no problem with vignetting, even with thick filters.
At that place is no vignetting even with three stacked filters, even on full-frame.
The filter ring never moves.
Focus Breathing functioning tiptop
Of interest mostly to cinematographers focusing back and forth between 2 subjects, the paradigm from the Sigma 50mm f/ane.4 DG HSM ART gets larger equally focused more closely.
It seems virtually the aforementioned as a common unit-focussed lens, even though it is a unique internally focused blueprint.
Ghosts, Flare and Sunstars performance pinnacle
Ghost resistance is peachy. The edges of the elements are all very finer blackened, and I come across fiddling to no internal components off of which flare could bounce.
Even with all this glass, at that identify is merely ane very dim blueish blob, and it's just visible under the almost contrived conditions thusly:
Flare blob, full solar disc, 02 September 2014. (Nikon D810, Sigma 50mm f/1.four, f/eight at 1/250 at Machine ISO 100, Athentech Perfectly Clear.) bigger.
Fifty-fifty though the diaphragm is circular at large apertures, sunstars are reasonably expert at moderate apertures. Bravo!
Sunstar, partly shielded sun, 02 September 2014. (Nikon D810, Sigma 50mm f/1.iv, f/viii at 1/250 at Motorcar ISO 100, Athentech Perfectly Articulate.) bigger.
Hood functioning top
LH-780-06 Hood on Sigma 50mm f/one.4 DG.
The large hood is included.
This Sigma has no flare problems, so the only reason to use the hood is that it tin help go on grime and flight food out of your lens.
Lateral Color Fringes operation height
In that location are no lateral color fringes as shot on my Nikon D810, which corrects any that might exist at that place automatically for any lens. Nikons need no lens data to right this; they can correct any random lens.
I take non tested this on Canon, which would not be able to correct it without a lens profile, which does non be. I doubtable this Sigma has petty to no lateral colour.
Macro performance meridian
Macro gets a fiddling closer than every other not-macro 50mm lens.
The published shut-focus altitude is just 0.4 one thousand instead of the usual 0.45 g:
Full-frame paradigm at close-focus distance at f/viii.
Stopped downwardly, information technology's super precipitous:
Crop from above 36 MP image at 100%. If this is half-dozen" (15cm) wide on your monitor, the entire epitome printed at this aforementioned high magnification would be 72 ten 48" (i.eight x 1.25 meters)!
Mechanics and Construction operation elevation
Sigma 50mm f/one.4 DG. enlarge.
The Sigma 50mm f/i.iv DG is a heavy lens made of plastic and metallic, with lots of glass within.
Filter Threads
Plastic.
Hood
Plastic bayonet.
Hood Mount
Plastic.
Focus Ring
Metal; safety covered.
Depth-of-Field Scale
Only for f/sixteen.
Rear Barrel
Plastic.
Very back of butt
Metal.
Aperture Band
None.
Internals
Seem like plastic and metal.
Mount
Shiny chromed brass.
Markings
Pigment.
Mounting Alphabetize Dot
Pocket-size white plastic brawl on the exterior, and a ruddy dot painted into an engraving in the lens mounting flange.
Identity Plate
None, simply painted on the lens barrel.
Series Number
Laser engraved onto the lens barrel above and the correct of the focus scale window.
Moisture seal at mount
None.
Noises When Shaken
Balmy clunking from the diaphragm and focus systems.
Made in
Nihon.
Weaknesses
As an off-brand lens it has unproven (with me) service facilities, and unknown future parts availability. When the HSM motor dies, yous're dead unless yous tin can get a replacement part — and you just might non exist able to in 10 years when you'd most need information technology.
New cameras may or may not piece of piece of work with this lens, and off-brand lens makers only sometimes will update lenses to work on new model cameras. ten or more years from at present I know my Nikon and Canon lenses volition piece of work on new cameras, just I don't take any high hopes for any off-make lens.
Sharpness operation top
Alarm one: Image sharpness depends more on you lot than your lens.
Warning 2: Lens sharpness doesn't mean much to expert photographers.
This is the sharpest 50mm f/i.iv lens I've e'er tested — but not by that much.
Amateurs waste also much time worrying well-nigh lens sharpness, and since this lens is designed for amateurs, it'due south super sharp.
I tested this randomly purchased sample on a 36MP DX Nikon D810 on the test range at infinity.
It'due south super sharp at every setting clear out to the corners, although but a little less sharp in the corners at f/1.iv due to a footling bit of coma. It'due south very sharp in the corners at f/one.4, only quite not as abrupt equally at the heart.
The Sigma 50mm f/i.4 is astoundingly sharp at every setting. You but demand to exist certain information engineering'south in focus and that nil moves.
It's really much more uniformly sharp than the sample of Nikon 58/1.4G I purchased. The Nikon 58/1.4G was softer on the left, which this Sigma is perfectly centered and every scrap sharp everywhere. Hah!
Compared tiptop
Intro Specifications Performance Compared Recommendations
NEW: Premium 50mm Lenses Compared 04 September 2014
I compared my Sigma directly to my Nikon l/one.4G and my Micro-NIKKOR 55mm f/2.8 AF on the test range at infinity.
At nigh apertures, they are indistinguishable from ane another.
The Nikon 50/i.4G is the only lens of these three with whatever baloney.
This Sigma is really slightly sharper than the Nikon 50/one.4G at f/1.four, but information technology's only the very slightest departure, and simply visible under tightly controlled test conditions. I'd come across no deviation in the field for actual photography; the newest Nikon 50/ane.4G is a superb lens.
This Sigma is too slightly sharper at f/2.eight than the Micro-NIKKOR 55mm f/2.eight AF is at f/2.viii. Neither has any distortion at most distances, although the Sigma has a tiny bit of distortion at shut distances which the Micro-NIKKOR does non.
I did non compare it to the Nikon 58mm f/1.4 K which is even slightly better than the Nikon 50mm f/ane.4G. (I have exam data from the aforementioned range at a different time.) The Nikon 58mm f/ane.4 G has moderately strong baloney, while the Sigma has none.
I didn't compare it to the $4,000 manual-focus Zeiss OTUS. Equally a transmission-focus lens, the OTUS doesn't intrigue me.
These lenses are all so proficient that I wouldn't worry about any optical differences; I'd worry virtually how much weight I want to deport and if it automobile focused or non, even if the toll was the aforementioned.
Ergonomically, the OTUS and this Sigma are pigs. They are big, heavy lenses that are not fun to behave around my cervix on a 5D Mk Three, D810 or bigger camera all twenty-four hour period. The other lenses are i-half the weight or less, and perform the aforementioned at anything other than f/i.4.
Recommendations top
Intro Specifications Functioning Compared Recommendations
This is an optically superb lens, simply at that place is far more than to a peachy photograph than a sharp lens. It has to be lite plenty to bask taking with you.
This Sigma is fantastic, if you don't heed conveying it. Personally, I adopt to pay a piffling more than for my fully professional person Catechism 50/ane.2 Fifty, which is fifty-fifty faster than this Sigma, and merely weighs 1-half as much. For my Nikon, I prefer my Nikon fifty/i.4G which weighs only a tertiary as much, and costs a third of what the Sigma does. The optics are 98% the same, while the size and weight of the Nikkor 50/1.4G are far superior to the Sigma.
This Sigma is platonic for people who shoot with tripods. Its functioning is unmatched, but information technology's more than weight than I want to carry.
When shot in the existent world, any 50mm lens is going to exist extremely abrupt, and sharper than than a 24-70mm f/2.8 pro zoom. Before you go spending a lot of coin on a super-duper 50mm lens, try any 50mm lens, especially the f/i.8, get-go.
I may be a picayune weird, only I always invest long term. I'd be shy most this Sigma lens because I demand the lens I purchase today to be earning coin for me for at to the lowest degree the next 20 years, and to notwithstanding be serviceable and valuable when I sell the lens afterwards all that time. My Nikon and Catechism pro lenses do this for me. I bought my Nikon 17-35mm f/two.viii AF-S in the 1990s, and information technology'south still Nikon'south pinnacle professional person ultrawide zoom fifteen years subsequently (the Nikon sixteen-35 VR is only a consumer lens, and the Nikon fourteen-24 is a special-purpose lens much less useful than the 17-35). My 17-35/2.8 is all the same worth, used, what I paid for it new.
If all you intendance nigh is the all-time possible optical quality for the adjacent several years, and so by all means this Sigma lens is superbly precipitous, focuses extremely fast and has no visible baloney. If you don't worry about long-term every bit I practise, this Sigma lens is fantastic.
If you lot think you want one of these Sigmas, or desire the sharpest possible 50mm lens for your DSLR, you'll beloved information technology. Its eyes actually are as good equally y'all've heard.
If y'all've institute my review helpful, the biggest source of support for this free website is when you use these links, peculiarly this link directly to this lens at Adorama and this link to it at Amazon, when you go anything, regardless of the land in which you live. Information technology helps me proceed calculation to this free website when you go yours through these links — but I receive nothing for my efforts if you buy elsewhere.
Cheers for your back up!
Ken.
Deployment
Sigma'due s caps aren't as skillful as Nikon's or Canon'southward. Get out them in the box for resale, and buy a real Nikon 77mm cap to use with this lens instead, regardless of which brand of photographic camera you shoot (Nikon makes the best caps). As well go a Nikon rear cap or Catechism rear cap and go out the Sigma cap in the box.
I would too go out the hood in the box for resale time. I don't use hoods.
Honestly, I rarely use front caps at all.
I'd leave either a 77mm Nikon Clear (NC - UV) filter, a 77mm Hoya Blastoff MC UV or impenetrable 77mm Hoya HD2 UV on the lens at all times instead. Call up of it as a clear optical lens cap, and you lot'll exist shooting a lot faster without fumbling.
If I was working in nasty, muddy areas, I'd forget the cap, and utilise an uncoated 77mm Tiffen UV filter instead. Uncoated filters are much easier to make clean, simply more prone to ghosting.
Assist me assistance you summit
I support my growing family unit through this website, equally crazy equally information applied science might seem.
The biggest aid is when you employ any of these links when yous go anything, regardless of the country in which y'all alive. Information technology costs you zilch, and is this site's, and thus my family'southward, biggest source of back up. These places have the best prices and service, which is why I've used them since before this website existed. I recommend them all personally.
If you notice this page as helpful every bit a volume you might accept had to buy or a workshop you may accept had to have, feel costless to assistance me continue helping anybody.
If you've gotten your gear through ane of my links or helped otherwise, y'all're family unit unit. Information technology'southward great people similar you who allow me to go on calculation to this site full-time. Thanks!
If you haven't helped yet, please practice, and consider helping me with a gift of $5.00.
As this folio is copyrighted and formally registered, it is unlawful to make copies, peculiarly in the form of printouts for personal use. If yous wish to brand a printout for personal use, yous are granted i-time permission only if you lot PayPal me $five.00 per printout or function thereof. Give thanks you!
Thanks for reading!
Mr. & Mrs. Ken Rockwell, Ryan and Katie.
Abode Donate NewSearch Gallery Reviews How-To Books Links Workshops Well-nigh Contact
Source: https://sanchezconsed.blogspot.com/2022/04/sigma-50mm-f14-dg-hsm-art-lens-review.html
0 Response to "Igma 50mm F14 Art Dg Hsm Lens for Canon"
Post a Comment